CIVINTEL
ELEN
Contact

Fragrances & chemicals

AROMA AI: formulation analysis and design for perfumers

Machine learning that analyses hundreds of fragrance formulations, proposes simpler recipes with the same olfactory character and generates new compositions under the perfumer’s control.

AI & DataDelivered · 2026CIVINTEL project

AROMA AI recipe lookup screen comparing an original formulation with a version reduced by 20%.
Interface screenshot
934
formulations analysed
1,000+
ingredients modelled
89.7%
of formulas reached the 20% reduction target

The challenge

A fragrance manufacturer wanted to understand which ingredients define each formula, reduce raw-material complexity without changing the scent, and adapt recipes quickly when regulations or supply change. The knowledge existed in ERP records and in the experience of the perfumers, but not in a form a computer could use.

Our approach

  1. Worked with the CEO, the Master Perfumer and the IT team to define the use cases and the validation rules.
  2. Converted complex ERP recipe records into a clean, machine-learning-ready dataset of formulations, ingredients and odour families.
  3. Trained and compared models that identify the ingredients carrying a formula’s identity and those that may be redundant.
  4. Built AROMA AI, an interactive React / Node.js dashboard with KPIs, model comparison, reduction analysis and a recipe generator.

Results & features

  • Proposes simplified formulas with 20–40% fewer ingredients while keeping the odour family and intensity within technical limits.
  • Adapts formulas to new constraints, such as removing an ingredient for export regulations.
  • Generates new compositions from a chosen ingredient count and target odour families. Every proposal remains subject to expert review and laboratory testing.
  • The same approach applies to cosmetics and food, for raw-material cost, portfolio simplification and product development.
Share of 934 formulations meeting each ingredient-reduction target
  • 20%89.7%
  • 30%58.4%
  • 40%23.3%

Computational results. Sensory equivalence requires laboratory assessment.

Have a similar challenge?

Tell us what you want to solve and what data, drawings or documents you already have.